David Band's trial begins - Grand Bay issues

Travel discussion for St. John
longtimer
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:17 am

David Band's trial begins - Grand Bay issues

Post by longtimer »

If you take pride in ownership at Grand Bay or you are a beloved renter, don't read any further.

Band is getting a little hot under the collar. His trial started Monday in Sarasota and is expected to last two weeks. See today's article from the Sarasota Herald Tribune.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20 ... 9526?tc=ar

More trials will be coming to keep people employed. It's really too bad the views of Cruz Bay are ruined forever. I don't think Band, Frye, Libby or the St. John realtors that sold Grand Bay from blue prints cared about the island or its people.
longtimer
hugo
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:06 pm
Location: St. John

Post by hugo »

Cared? Are you kidding? Why would they?
User avatar
Teresa_Rae
Posts: 2053
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:44 pm
Location: Downstate IL

Post by Teresa_Rae »

Thanks for the link, I didn't know anybody was being held accountable, it seemed like it was getting swept under the rug.
Let us live so that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry.
- Mark Twain
User avatar
byado18
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Central Illinois

Post by byado18 »

I wonder if this is why all the unsold units were pulled from the market!?
California Girl

Re: David Band's trial begins - Grand Bay issues

Post by California Girl »

longtimer wrote:I don't think Band, Frye, Libby or the St. John realtors that sold Grand Bay from blue prints cared about the island or its people.
Thanks for posting this link, longtimer, I'm finding this all extremely fascinating. As I sit out here in the bleachers I can see both from the viewpoint of the people who have purchased/rented at Grande Bay, and also see just how slimy this Band guy is. Like I said, fascinating.
User avatar
Betty
Posts: 471
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Cruz Bay St John

Post by Betty »

the unsold units are going back on the market as time shares. That is why they were pulled.
Exit Zero
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:50 pm
Location: virgin islands

Post by Exit Zero »

Timeshares - now there is a financial instrument that is rarely ever abused and really always seems to be represented by only the most stellar of reputable and honorable salespeople with just the clients best interests at heart.
Certainly the STJ Real Estate salespeople who received the Standard 6% sales commission on Grande Bay will be saddened by this new opportunity.
Great article, thank You for posting it.
www.stjohnsource.com also has an informative article about the' failed condo project '.
User avatar
toni
Posts: 1064
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:05 pm
Location: ny state of mind

Post by toni »

Ok, I must be confused; I thought this was the guy who was the Pond Bay fiasco? Or is he both? Guess I didn't realize that Grand Bay was still uncompleted.
User avatar
Teresa_Rae
Posts: 2053
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:44 pm
Location: Downstate IL

Post by Teresa_Rae »

Why is there no mention of all the rules that were broken (i.e. building height)? I guess Florida probably isn't the place for that discussion. Will anybody ever be held accountable for that?
Let us live so that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry.
- Mark Twain
longtimer
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:17 am

The saga continues for Band et al

Post by longtimer »

Here's the 2nd article on Band's trial. Construction errors - imagine that. And I thought these were seasoned investors & builders.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20 ... st-cutting

Regarding time share units, is that illegal in a R-4 district? I don't think so.
longtimer
PA Girl
Posts: 4485
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:55 am

Post by PA Girl »

Teresa_Rae wrote:Why is there no mention of all the rules that were broken (i.e. building height)? I guess Florida probably isn't the place for that discussion. Will anybody ever be held accountable for that?
I am also wonder that.

My dad was a developer (single-family and commercial projects) and in a prior job, I worked in the same line of business. I am baffled by the things that happen on STJ.

Where I live, getting approval for a sign can take several township meetings and constant inspection by officials to make sure one doesn't try to move the sign 6 inches closer to the road than allowed.

So many fingers are pointed at the developers (and maybe rightly so) but where are the STJ elected or appointed officials in all this? Were they paid to look the other way?
California Girl

Post by California Girl »

Still fascinated.
Herald Tribune wrote: The attorney also noted that, according to partnership documents, Band could only be removed by a vote of two-thirds of Grande Bay's partnership interests -- even though the overwhelming majority of partner shares were held by Band, family members or close friends.
Hmmmm. How conveeeenient! (said in my best SNL "Church Lady" voice)

Herald Tribune wrote:Keane also asserted that an indemnification in the partnership contract gave Band immunity from mistakes.
Can I get a job contract that gives me immunity from mistakes, too? :roll:
hugo
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:06 pm
Location: St. John

Post by hugo »

What elected or appointed officials? We have one senator, who is "at large" (elected by all three islands, must reside on St. John) and one Administrator (appointed by the Governor, no qualifications required). All of our decisions are made by St. Thomas, and we can easily see how much they care about their own island--much less St. John, which is regarded at best with condescension, at worst with jealousy and greed.
PA Girl
Posts: 4485
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:55 am

Post by PA Girl »

hugo wrote:What elected or appointed officials? We have one senator, who is "at large" (elected by all three islands, must reside on St. John) and one Administrator (appointed by the Governor, no qualifications required). All of our decisions are made by St. Thomas, and we can easily see how much they care about their own island--much less St. John, which is regarded at best with condescension, at worst with jealousy and greed.
Ok, now it is starting to makes more sense to me. So the USVIs doesn't have zoning or code enforcement? No one to say "hey, that building is too high or whatever and you must correct it."
User avatar
augie
Posts: 2376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:26 am
Location: Where the weather suits my clothes

Post by augie »

PA Girl wrote:Ok, now it is starting to makes more sense to me. So the USVIs doesn't have zoning or code enforcement? No one to say "hey, that building is too high or whatever and you must correct it."
Go look at some of the villa building blogs. I'd opine that rather than "no code enforcement" they have a lot of "$elective code enforcement"...
Come see us!
Post Reply